Friday, May 18, 2007

The Hated San Antonio Spurs

On Friday night the San Antonio Spurs defeated the Phoenix Suns 114-106 to win the Western Conference Semifinals series 4-2. In so doing, the Spurs
  1. Knocked out their toughest remaining challenger and essentially wrapped up the NBA championship.
  2. Proved once again that faster, higher scoring, flashier teams are no match for them.
  3. Destroyed all hope of the existence of any entertaining basketball until next fall.
  4. Officially surpassed the Miami Heat and Los Angeles Lakers as my most hated NBA franchise.
The Spurs are now a shoo-in to win their fourth NBA Championship since 1999. The Lakers won three straight championships from 2000 to 2002, but their recent struggles since losing Shaquille O'Neal to the Heat make the Spurs the most dominant basketball team in the world over the last ten years. It's so sad that the Lakers and Spurs have dominated the best years of my basketball-watching life. These are odious teams, short on style, flavor, and charisma. But I can't blame the Spurs - their only goal is to win basketball games, and they clearly do this more effectively than anyone else.

The Spurs' dominance began after they drafted Tim Duncan with the first overall pick in the 1997 NBA draft. Since his NBA career began, Duncan has been the most consistent and, arguably, best, player in the game. Duncan, however, does not get as much adulation as his superstar peers, players like Kobe Bryant, Steve Nash, Dwyane Wade, and LeBron James. The main reasons for this are
  1. Duncan's game is very mundane. He rarely makes jawdropping or even entertaining plays.
  2. Duncan's demeanor rarely changes. Fans like to see emotion and Duncan always looks the same, except when his eyes bug out annoyingly when he protests a foul.
  3. Duncan's career has been boringly standard and efficient - he played all four years in college at an ACC school; he got drafted first overall; he's never had a run-in with the law and/or a notable character incident; his teams have won a few championships, but never consecutively (which would garner more attention).
Head coach Gregg Popovich took over the Spurs just months before Duncan was drafted. Timing is just one of many parallels between Duncan and Popovich. Like his greatest student, Popovich is startlingly boring. Just read this wikipedia article on Popovich without drifting off. Also like Duncan, Popovich does not get nearly the credit he deserves. The results say Pop is the best coach in the NBA, but most casual fans would probably be quicker to mention Phil Jackson, Pat Riley, and Larry Brown. Popovich
  1. Is abysmal with the media
  2. Never does anything to differentiate himself (other than winning games)
  3. Doesn't use gimmicks to inspire his team or self-promote
As a result, no one really notices or cares about him, and that's probably how he wants it.

Manu Ginobili is the one Spur who plays with panache, but his game is so irritating that his distinctiveness becomes a source of annoyance rather than respect. Ginobili is one of the biggest targets of boos from fans outside of San Antonio, because
  1. His favorite move is to drive wildly into the lane, initiate contact, sprawl his body out and toss the ball towards the hoop, get a whistle and then sink two free throws.
  2. He flops more than anyone in the NBA now that Vlade Divac is retired.
  3. He has an unsightly bald spot
  4. He's Argentine/Italian and radiates disdainful Euroness
Tony Parker is quietly one of the five best point guards in the NBA. Like Ginobili, there are plenty of easy reasons to despise him:
  1. He's French
  2. He can't shoot worth a damn
  3. He's engaged to Eva Longoria
Bruce Bowen is the Spurs most underrated player. Marcus Camby's win of the NBA's defensive player of the year award this season confirms this. Bowen has turned countless offensive dynamos into sand, Steve Nash being the latest victim. Bowen provides nothing on offense except for his staple, infuriating three-balls from the corner. Bowen is a player to respect but also a player to hate, because

  1. He plays dirty
  2. He makes the game less entertaining
  3. He's just not easy to like
Robert Horry, in the twilight of his soon-to-be-seven-championship career, has made more big shots at key moments for the Spurs than their bigger stars. Horry doesn't do much these days other than foul and conduct halftime interviews, but there was a time when he was one of the most feared playoff performers in the NBA. Horry's an immensely likable player, but he has also been the twister of many knives throughout his career. Like his brethren, there are myriad reasons to hate on Horry
  1. His career 7.2 ppg average indicates he may be incredibly overrated
  2. He has crushed the dreams of many of the NBA's most likable up-and-coming teams, giving championships to boring teams that have already won too many
  3. His flagrant foul on Steve Nash in Game 4 of this year's series led to the one-game suspensions of Amare Stoudemire and Boris Diaw which likely cost the Suns Game 5 and the NBA Championship.
There's just not a lot to be said. The Spurs play great defense, they have enough playmakers on offense to win games, and they have the best big man in the world. There is really only one more thing I can add:

Go Jazz!

4 Comments:

Blogger Cyrus said...

i have no doubt that if nash hadn't busted his nose, they'd have won that game. San Antonio was like 2-15 on the road when games go above 100.

i have no doubt that the 88-85 point game w/o amare would have been won if he had just kept his ass on the bench.

series was ruined by both of those stupid things.

now we just gotta root for lebron to single handledly destroy our fears of another boring pistons/spurs finals.

11:41 AM  
Blogger David Hoedeman said...

Moon,

Gotta respectfully disagree with everything you say here.

You have something against good basketball? Apparently.

I'm as big a Suns fan as anyone outside of Arizona. Love that team. Love Nash. Even love the less-likable Amare and D'Antoni. That being said, there's a lot to like about the Spurs.

1. Duncan is incredible. For anyone who cares about basketball, they should consider it a treat to grow up watching the NBA in an era where one of the top few two-way low-post players of all time dominates the league. It's really pretty special. He's usntoppable one-on-one, and plays the best low post D of anyone we've ever had the pleasure of watching. I include Mutumbo, Mourning, Shaq, Ewing, and Olajuwan in this. While he may get less blocks than these guys, he is in the exact right place 100% of the time, and makes it damn near impossible to score near the basket (case in point, this Jazz game I'm watching wear a great pentrator (williams) and superstar low-post scorer (boozer) look terrible.)

2. Tony Parker is one of the most exciting players in the league. He does things that no one else can do. No one. And I'm not even sure if he's one of the top 5 point guards (case to be made for Nash, Kidd, Paul, Williams, Billups). But he is fun to watch.

3. I hate Bruce Bowen and Manu. Always have. Can't argue that.

4. Can't hate on Big shot Bob. Just can't.

5. How about a team that gets quality minutes out of Jacues Vaughn and Franciso Elson? No love for such quintessential role-players?

5. Why the hell are you counting the Pistons out of this thing? That is a damn good team. They're better than they were last year. Don't overestimate the impact of losing Wallace. He wasn't that integral to what they do.

6. Still... Go Jazz!

3:34 PM  
Blogger Spencetron said...

I absolutely disagree with your extremely unfair portrayal of the Serbian Superstar Vlade Divac. For true lovers of the game nothing competed with his intimidating outside shots and unstoppable post D. He never "flopped". He never accused the other team of getting lucky. He never created unnecessary drama. Oh for the good old days of Shaq-Vlade all California battles of the two bets players in the league!

12:15 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

great take on the spurs

4:07 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home